It has often been said that if you think education is expensive, try ignorance. Africa provides many lessons on the damage done by ignorance, and if the continent is to get rid of gloomy perceptions, it will be through education. For the continent to develop, its education must change, writes Pusch Commey. After all, as Nelson Mandela put it: “Education is the most powerful weapon, which you can use to change the world.”

More than 50 years ago, Nkrumah also noted the need to
equip students with an understanding of the contemporary world within the
framework of African civilisations, their histories, institutions, and ideas.
African studies was compulsory in the universities he built in Ghana. The first university in the world was African – Al
Karaouine, in Fez, Morocco (859 AD), founded by an African woman. It was a full
229 years before the first European University was erected at Bologna in 1088
AD. Before the disruption of slavery, colonialism,
oppression, and destruction from the 15th century on, history tells us of the great
African medieval civilisations, and the part that higher institutions of
learning played in African academic and cultural life. There is no doubt that
in the 13th century, centres of learning such as Walata, Djenna, and Timbuktu
had a singular impact on African education and that the University of Sankore,
with 25,000 students, had already qualified amongst the foremost intellectual
inspirations in the world.

Prof. Mahmood Mamdani of Uganda argues in his article
entitled “Politics and Class Formation in Uganda”, that the missionary
education was designed as a tool of control, not one of empowerment. He points
out: “The political usefulness of missionary education, it should be clear,
stemmed from its dual nature: that it was technical as well as ideological, that
it imparted skills such as reading, writing, and arithmetic as well as values
such as loyalty to the existing order and disciplined self-sacrifice in the
interest of that order.
“This was not education, but training; not liberation, but enslavement. Its purpose was not to educate a person to understand the objective limits to the advancement of individual and collective welfare, but to train a person to accept and even administer the limits in an ‘efficient’ manner.”
In an uncomfortably high number of cases, the elitist
products of the system were hard-wired to mimic and replicate western views and
values while thumbing their nose at local knowledge and practices, including
those that were progressive. But it also signalled the death of the nation’s
community spirit, as the severe individualism of Europe supplanted the African
spirit of collective welfare.
“Fast material progress had produced a brand of young men, who though in a sense were quite educated, lacked any intellectual commitment to causes.”
They could read and write but as they were handed the
monumental task of building a nation-state, they could neither hear nor learn,
notes the Professor. The eminent academic Edward Said writes, in his book
Culture and Imperialism:
“Neither imperialism nor colonialism is a simple act of accumulation and acquisition. Both are supported and perhaps even impelled by impressive ideological formations which include notions that certain territories and people require and beseech domination, as well as forms of knowledge affiliated with that domination.”
Bwesigye Bwa Mwesigire, writing on the decolonisation
process, notes:
“African pupils and students learnt that explorers Mungo Park (Scottish) and John Speke (English) discovered River Niger and the source of the River Nile respectively despite the fact that the people who lived around these rivers already knew of their existence and had names for them. Something was not true, was not real knowledge until it came off English lips, eyes and ears. And what came off the colonial office was meant to justify colonialism. Thus, through education, Africans were fed an inferiority complex.”
And as many have noted, confidence is half the battle
won. The pattern of brainwashing the minds of Africans to subservience was
replicated everywhere and illustrated in the last African country to obtain
independence, South Africa, where the infamous Bantu education was designed to
make blacks aspire to be bus drivers and labourers.

“We want to establish the centrality of Africa in the department. This, we have argued, is justifiable on various grounds, the most important one being that education is a means of knowledge about ourselves. Therefore, after we have examined ourselves, we radiate outwards and discover peoples and worlds around us. With Africa at the centre of things, not existing as an appendix or a satellite of other countries and literatures, things must be seen from the African perspective.”
Mwesigire notes that in Uganda several steps to
decolonise the education curriculum have been undertaken to date.
“At present, learners in [classes] Primary One to Three learn about their immediate environment, through the oral strand. They learn about the family, the home, school, neighbourhood and sub-county. This is called the thematic curriculum, and they study in their local languages, with English studied as a subject.
It is at Primary Four that learners transit to studying
in English. Under Social Studies, learners are taught about the district in
which their school is located. They learn about its location, physical
features, vegetation, people, leaders, and how to meet people’s needs in the
district. In Primary Five, they look at Uganda, Primary Six, East Africa and in
Primary Seven, Africa. There is no doubt that the curriculum is very contextual
up to this level. The textbooks in use are almost all locally produced. The
textbook industry in the country is booming because materials produced from
outside can’t be used to teach the new curriculum. Thus, where John Speke would
have been praised as the one who discovered the River Nile, the Primary Five
textbook says that the river was called Kiira by the Basoga, who live around
it, and John Speke was the first European to see it.

The reasons for the tectonic shift to innovation and
creativity are not far-fetched. After all, while resources can yield so much
that is finite, knowledge, creativity and innovative ideas like Facebook or
Google can generate enterprises worth billions of dollars, that exceed in
value the destructive extraction of tons of gold, and years of oil drilling. It
is also instructive that science, renewable energy and new innovations like
fracking will upset the apple cart. Importantly, knowledge and creativity is
infinite. The experts at WISE in Doha noted that with creative tools like
Google, a web-connected device and bandwidth, knowledge is now at one’s
finger-tips. Ignorance is no longer an excuse. It is learning how to innovate
and create something new that will drive the world. The old era of standardised test scores in schools is
going out of the window. The new world is about mobile schools, online
education, and the kind of creative thinking that says a dissertation could be
on the impact the song and dance Gangnam Style had on the South Korean economy.
Technology, coding and the internet have a massive role to play. After all,
Gangnam Style was driven by YouTube, the creative force of technology.

Unleashing the African Genius: Very few will dispute that in the quest for an appropriate education, best
practice should form an integral part of the African agenda. And that means
shopping around the world, and adapting best practice to one’s special
environment and circumstances, whether from England, China, India, South Korea,
Singapore or Malaysia. Some African educational experts on the continent and in
the Diaspora are adamant that the right foundation and direction in education
for the African child must be African-centred. Similar principles have been adopted in developed and
developing countries that are making great strides; Chinese education is
Chinese-centred and so is German education, German-centred. In the diaspora, some African parents prefer to send
their children to Afro-centred schools or use an African-centred home schooling
curriculum, many arguing that the status quo negatively impacts their
children’s self-esteem and confidence.
But What Does African-Centred Education Mean? An African-centred education is defined as education designed to empower
African people. A central premise is that many Africans have been subjugated by
limiting their awareness of themselves and indoctrinating them with ideas that
work against them. In a 1992 article, US anthropologist Linus A. Hoskins
wrote: “There is a vital necessity for African people to use the weapons of
education and history to extricate themselves from this psychological
dependency complex/syndrome as a necessary precondition for liberation… If
African peoples (the global majority) were to become Afrocentric (African-centred),
that would spell the ineluctable end of European global power and dominance.
This is indeed the fear of Europeans… Afrocentrism is a state of mind, a
particular subconscious mind-set that is rooted in the ancestral heritage and
communal value system.”

Pusch Commey is a Barrister of the High Court of South
Africa, Award winning writer and associate editor of New African Magazine since
1999. He is based in Johannesburg South Africa. He is the author of 9 books
including the best selling 100 great African kings and queens, and Tofi's Fire
Dance. He is also the CEO of the South African based Real African Publishers,
and the founder of the Real African Writers series. The original article can be found here
No comments:
Post a Comment